Common buying triggers
- Employees are using GenAI without a complete inventory.
- Customer or board questions about AI risk are increasing.
- AI vendors process sensitive or customer data.
- LLM applications need security testing and accountable approval.
Govern AI use at the speed the business adopts it—without blocking useful experimentation or ignoring material risk.
The examples below are illustrative advisory outputs and do not represent a specific client.
Use cases, owners, models/vendors, data classes, integrations, criticality, and approval status.
Security, privacy, model, vendor, operational, legal, and customer risks with accountable decisions.
Approved use, prohibited data, human oversight, testing, vendor, logging, and escalation expectations.
Decision records, evaluations, vendor evidence, testing results, and governance reviews.
Identify sanctioned and shadow AI, data flows, vendors, and business criticality.
Apply risk tiers, approval gates, vendor expectations, and LLM security controls.
Create monitoring, periodic review, exception, and executive reporting cadence.
At minimum: inventory, ownership, risk classification, approved-use rules, data controls, vendor due diligence, security testing for AI-enabled applications, human oversight, monitoring, evidence, and exception handling.
Not universally. It can provide a useful management-system structure for organizations that need formal AI governance, but the decision should follow customer, regulatory, and operating needs.