Translate DORA-driven customer and governance expectations into owned resilience, evidence, and third-party controls.
The examples below are illustrative advisory outputs and do not represent a specific client.
Requirements mapped to existing controls, evidence, accountable owners, and gaps.
Critical services, systems, providers, concentrations, resilience assumptions, and owners.
Testing, incident, continuity, recovery, vendor, and governance evidence structured for review.
Prioritized actions based on material customer/regulatory exposure.
Identify the DORA requirements that apply to the organization or arise through customer contracts.
Review ICT risk, incident, testing, continuity, recovery, and third-party controls.
Assign owners, close gaps, and establish recurring evidence maintenance.
Not directly. DORA applies to specified EU financial entities and certain critical ICT third-party providers, while many other technology suppliers experience DORA requirements through contracts and customer assurance.
Yes, some governance, risk, incident, supplier, continuity, and control evidence can support both, but DORA has specific operational resilience and financial-sector requirements that need separate mapping.